← back to the front page

🗞️ Story file #1857

John Fetterman criticizes van Hollen's Senate leadership bid

Nov 14, 5 PM ET to Nov 14, 7 PM ET

👣 How this story traveled: from the front pages that broke it, out through TV, radio and the shows, into what people retold and what fact-checkers examined, and on into the saga it is part of. Everything here is matched to the story by our tools, so a link can be wrong; the trackers' pages say how each is made.

📰 read it at: MediaiteThe IndependentBloombergNewsweekThe HillThe Washington TimesWashington ExaminerTownhall

  1. Nov 14, 1 PM ET

    first on a front page: Townhall

  2. Nov 14, 7 PM ET

    peak: on 8 front pages at once

📰 Spread

the front pages that ran it, hour by hour

482 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PMpeak: 8 front pages, Sat 7 PMSat Nov 14, 1 PM ET: on 1 front pages (1 right) “John Fetterman Isn't Too Happy With Chris Van Hollen's Senate Leadership Bid” (Townhall)Sat Nov 14, 2 PM ET: on 5 front pages (1 right, 1 leans right, 1 leans left, 2 center) “Fetterman Says Van Hollen as Senate Leader Would Be ‘Troubling’” (Bloomberg)Sat Nov 14, 3 PM ET: on 6 front pages (1 right, 2 leans right, 1 leans left, 2 center) “Fetterman Says Van Hollen as Senate Leader Would Be ‘Troubling’” (Bloomberg)Sat Nov 14, 4 PM ET: on 6 front pages (1 right, 2 leans right, 1 leans left, 2 center) “Fetterman Says Van Hollen as Senate Leader Would Be ‘Troubling’” (Bloomberg)Sat Nov 14, 5 PM ET: on 7 front pages (1 right, 2 leans right, 2 leans left, 2 center) “Fetterman Says Van Hollen as Senate Leader Would Be ‘Troubling’” (Bloomberg)Sat Nov 14, 6 PM ET: on 7 front pages (1 right, 2 leans right, 2 leans left, 2 center) “Fetterman Says Van Hollen as Senate Leader Would Be ‘Troubling’” (Bloomberg)Sat Nov 14, 7 PM ET: on 8 front pages (1 right, 2 leans right, 2 leans left, 3 center) “Fetterman: Van Hollen as leader would be ‘troubling’” (Washington Examiner)
Front pages carrying it each hour, by the outlets' lean, the side that had it first at the bottom:leans leftcenterleans rightright. First: Townhall, Sat 1:01 PM ET.
Nov 14, 2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PM7 PMTownhallTownhallTownhall, Nov 14, 1:01 PM ET: John Fetterman Isn't Too Happy With Chris Van Hollen's Senate Leadership BidMediaiteMediaiteMediaite, Nov 14, 2:00 PM ET: Fetterman Reveals on Fox the ‘Red Line’ That Would Make Him Ditch Democratic PartyThe Washington TimesThe Washington TimesThe Washington Times, Nov 14, 2:00 PM ET: Fetterman says he might leave Dems if Van Hollen is elected Senate leaderBloombergBloombergBloomberg, Nov 14, 2:00 PM ET: Fetterman Says Van Hollen as Senate Leader Would Be ‘Troubling’The HillThe HillThe Hill, Nov 14, 2:00 PM ET: Fetterman: Naming Van Hollen majority leader ‘would be troubling’Washington ExaminerWashington ExaminerWashington Examiner, Nov 14, 3:00 PM ET: Fetterman says Van Hollen as leader would be ‘troubling’ due to hostility toward IsraelWashington Examiner, Nov 14, 7:00 PM ET: Fetterman: Van Hollen as leader would be ‘troubling’The IndependentThe IndependentThe Independent, Nov 14, 5:00 PM ET: John Fetterman signals he would consider quitting Democratic Party if they make ‘troubling’ majority leader pickNewsweekNewsweekNewsweek, Nov 14, 7:00 PM ET: John Fetterman Signals Breaking Point With Democrats Over Van Hollen
Who carried it and when: each outlet in the order it picked the story up, a bar for each headline from when we first saw it on the front page to when we last did, in the outlet's lean color (dashed: not rated); a dot marks a new headline, and a headline swapped for a new one between our hourly looks runs on to it. A gap means a look found the story gone from that front page. Beneath, its captions on TV, the radio newscasts that carried it (bigger: the lead) and when people were found retelling it. Hover for details.

💬 Quoted

  1. “troubling”4
  2. “Red Line”1

phrases its headlines put in quotation marks; the bar is how many outlets did

📌 Linked by aggregators

1 Political Wire

aggregators linking to it from their front page (they don't count as outlets covering it)

▸ ✏️ 1 outlet ran more than one headline on it (reworded, or a follow-up)
  • Washington Examiner (2 wordings): “Fetterman says Van Hollen as leader would be ‘troubling’ due to hostility toward Israel” → “Fetterman: Van Hollen as leader would be ‘troubling’”
📰 Every outlet's headline 8left to right by AllSides rating

📡 Broadcast

TV, radio, and the shows that talked about it

🎙️ On the shows

podcasts, newsletters and streams that talked about it, by show; the bar is episodes; the disc is the show's lean by reputation

  1. 🫏 David Pakman Show 1

🕵️ Investigated, joked about

🕵️ investigative reporting on it and 🃏 satire joking about it (jokes, never counted as coverage); the bar is pieces

No investigator or satirist matched to it yet.

🧶 Retelling

what people online made of it

Nobody's retelling it online yet, as far as the daily reports of the last week can tell.

🗣️ Names in it

John FettermanAnthony S. Van HollenSenateDemocratic PartyFox

🔎 Checking

what the fact-checkers looked into

No fact-checker has taken it on yet.

🧵 Persistence

the running story it belongs to

🧵 Senate leadership bid claims →

  1. 1

    Nov 12, 10 PM ET

    Senator Van Hollen challenges Schumer for Senate majority leader

  2. 2

    Nov 14, 5 PM ET · 📍 this story

    John Fetterman criticizes van Hollen's Senate leadership bid

👋 About bignews.day · how it works
Rebuilt every hour from the front pages of the outlets we follow.
Lean ratings: AllSides (CC BY-NC 4.0) · reliability: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). emoji: OpenMoji (CC BY-SA 4.0). Everything else (mood, spin, feelings, framing) is our own reading of the headlines.
Our methods log: CC BY 4.0. The motif index, our readings and our other writing: © bignews.day, all rights reserved.
We count visits with GoatCounter: no cookies, nothing personal kept.